State V. Adkins, Perry’s Dissent

Luke Jarrod Adkins had the misfortune of being charged with the horrific offense of possessing a controlled substance. To the average person “possessing” something would conclude you had knowledge of what it was that you possessed, especially if possessing it…

Read More

Return to Confusion: With or Without Knowledge – Updated 08/13/12.

The Supreme Court of Florida has tried to clarify what the State need to do to prove a DWLS case when it does not have the presumption of knowledge that is found in the statute. ANDERSON v. STATE, 37 Fla….

Read More

Coronas, Crawford, and Discovery Depositions

Corona v. State, 36 Fla. L. Weekly S247 (Fla. Jun 9, 2011): Review Granted, Reversed for new trial – State used out-of-court statements (lots) to convict this guy of a very serious crime.  After being PCA’d by the 5th DCA…

Read More

Kentucky and the King: an exigent step to a bright-line rule

Kentucky v. King, 22 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S979 (May 16, 2011): Writ of Certiorari, Granted – It must be noted that all but one Justice (Ginsberg) joined in this opinion.  The police investigating suspected drug dealing set up a…

Read More